Useful over bloated
Every feature should help a maintenance team plan, complete, prove or improve real work.
THE STORY BEHIND MAINTAIN CMMS

FOR ENGINEERS, BY AN ENGINEER
— John Lambert, CreatorI’ve worked in engineering for more than 30 years, so I understand what engineers want—and what they don’t.
They don’t want hundreds of functions they’ll never use, creeping charges whenever another engineer or asset is added, or software that requires a degree in rocket science.
They want something that does what it says: one clear place for work, assets, servicing, inspections and records, with automation remembering the routine tasks.
I couldn’t find the straightforward CMMS I wanted engineers to have. So I decided to build it.
Here we are.
Every feature should help a maintenance team plan, complete, prove or improve real work.
No per-user or per-asset charges that punish a growing team for using the system properly.
Automation should remove reminders and repetitive administration—not add another layer of complexity.
CMMS WITHOUT THE FAFF
READY TO GET MAINTENANCE UNDER CONTROL?